CulTure TraVel

HOW THE INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION WAS DESTROYED: JYOTIRMAYA PRASAD BEHERA

 


HOW THE INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION WAS DESTROYED: INDUS VALLEY CULTURE: JYOTIRMAYA PRASAD BEHERA

 

Indus valley Civilization is one of the civilization among the ancient civilization. Actually time has not been defined by any archeologists and the period is very from person to person. Some archeologists told the period from 3500 to 1500 BC and /or some archeologists defined from 3300 to 1300. Indus Civilization was covered Afganistan, Pakistan and Western India. The main source of income or live hood derived from the farming and trading with the Sumerian. Till yet it is difficult to catch the clue by the archeologist that how and when this civilization was destroyed and why / who destroyed. The archeologist have made opinion that there are some following occurrence for which the civilization might be destroyed.

(i)           Flood

(ii)          Earthquake

(iii)        Attacked by Sumerian

 

 

(i)           FLOOD:-

Indus valley Civilization was situated near side of or bank of Sindu River. All the ancient civilization were situated on bank of river. The main reason was to established their settler on bank of river that the fertile areas. The main source of income  was farming and for farming needs fertile areas. On rainy day in Sindu River was come the flood and due to flood, the fertile soil were found. The archeologist opinioned that there must be big flood came and destroyed the entire city. The scientists have made opinion that the main reason of the collapse of Indus Civilization  due to flood. The Preliminary studies by Raikes suggested that a great natural disaster( a series of vast floods) could have been a major factor. Rising of Sea level can be devastating for coastal settlement since there is no recovering from it. The scientist has found some records of floods across the ancient civilization.

 

Earthquake

The regional tectonic setting is controlled by the collision of the Indian and Eurasian plates and the seduction of the Arabian plate beneath the Eurasian plate. Earthquakes have undoubtedly struck many ancient sites, but finding their footprint in a riparian environment represents a challenge for archaeoseismology. However, some insight into seismoarchaeological indicators can be gleaned from examining the earthquake effects produced by historical infrequent large-magnitude events that have occurred in the region. Studies of these earthquakes emphasize the importance of repeated reconstructions, direct faulting, river damming from seismic uplift, and coastal elevation change as indicators of past earthquakes. Examples of past earthquake effects are presented for Banbhore in the Indus Delta, Brahmanabad, and the Harappan sites of Kalibangan and Dholavira. Future hermeneutic investigations in the region need to incorporate a seismological/tectonic perspective and not rely solely on serendipity.

 

ATTACKED BY SUMERIAN

 

Only in the south, on the Arabian Sea coast, might the Indus dwellers have faced attack. It’s perhaps no coincidence that this is where the only fortified settlements have been found. As for a possible attack from distant Mesopotamia, there would have been little motivation, given the value of the Indus trade, advantage the fact that Mesopotamian rulers were preoccupied with internal battles.

 

For protection from seasonal floods and polluted waters, the settlements were built on giant platforms and elevated grounds. Upon these foundations, networks of streets were laid out in neat patterns of straight lines and right angles. The buildings along the roads were all constructed of bricks that were uniform in size.

 

The city lacks ostentatious palaces, temples, or monuments. There's no obvious central seat of government or evidence of a king or queen. Modesty, order, and cleanliness were apparently preferred. Pottery and tools of copper and stone were standardized. Seals and weights suggest a system of tightly controlled trade.

 

 

Whatever the scientists find, there is a possibility that the results would lead to much recrimination, as is already happening over interpretations of medieval Indian history. But to fight over the findings would be pointless. Every single Indian, like the vast majority of the human population, is a descendant of migrants and almost every Indian carries multiple lineages. (The possible exception to this are the Onge tribes in the Andaman and Nicobar islands who escaped the large-scale genetic mixing that occurred in India between 2,000 BC and the early centuries of the Common Era, as suggested by recent genetic research). Some of our lineages come from the original OOA migrants, some from Neolithic migrations from West Asia, some from Neolithic migrations from East Asia, some from Bronze Age migrations from the Steppes, and some from migrations that happened even later.

After the collapse of Indus Civilization, emerged “ARYANS”.  A race of European or Central Asian “ARYANS” swept into the subcontinent displacing the original Indus Civilization and it might be the reason for the collapse. Various elements of the Indus Civilization are found in later cultures, suggesting the civilization did not disappear suddenly due to an invasion. Many scholars came to believe in an Indo-Aryan Migration theory stating that the Harappan culture was assimilated during a migration of the Aryan people into northwest India.

Alexander the Great spread his empire south and east from Macedonia until he was stopped at India's Beas River. His last conquest had been the Indus River Valley, which runs the length of present-day Pakistan. if Alexander, gazing across the Indus Valley 2400 years ago, realized that a great civilization had thrived there, three thousand years before him.